Meta, the parent company of platforms like Facebook and Instagram, has announced the termination of its third-party fact-checking program in favor of a community-driven “Community Notes” system. This decision, made public on January 7th, 2025, marks a pivot towards a model pioneered by X (formerly Twitter), where instead users contribute to fact-checking and adding context to posts. This change could have profound implications for users in Thailand, where social media plays a crucial role in shaping public opinion, disseminating news, and facilitating political discourse.
TPN Media notes that this alleged censorship recently came to light during the COVID-19 crisis and US elections in which fact checkers were increasingly accused of allegedly censoring certain viewpoints or information to favor a mostly left leaning bias. It also comes from revelations of governments, including the Biden/Harris administration, pressuring Facebook to censor certain content, especially around vaccines or lockdowns during COVID-19.
In a letter to the U.S. House Judiciary Committee, Mark Zuckerberg admitted that in 2021, senior officials from the Biden-Harris administration, including the White House, repeatedly pressured Meta for months to censor certain COVID-19 content. This included humor and satire, with government officials expressing frustration when Meta didn’t comply. Zuckerberg stated, “I believe the government pressure was wrong, and I regret that we were not more outspoken about it,” indicating a direct acknowledgment of government influence on content moderation decisions.
Impact on Thai Users
1. Information Quality
-
Positive Outlook: Proponents argue that this might democratize the process of information verification, enabling a broader spectrum of voices, including those from Thailand, to contribute to the narrative around news and events.
Proponents argue that this might democratize the process of information verification, enabling a broader spectrum of voices, including those from Thailand, to contribute to the narrative around news and events.
-
Concerns: However, there’s a palpable worry from some people especially on forums like Reddit that without professional fact-checkers, the quality of information might decline. Misinformation, especially in politically sensitive areas or during elections, could proliferate more freely. In Thailand, where political discourse can be sensitive due to historical and cultural contexts, this could increase alleged misinformation, particularly in languages like Thai where fewer users might participate in community notes.
However, there’s a palpable worry from some people especially on forums like Reddit that without professional fact-checkers, the quality of information might decline. Misinformation, especially in politically sensitive areas or during elections, could proliferate more freely. In Thailand, where political discourse can be sensitive due to historical and cultural contexts, this could increase alleged misinformation, particularly in languages like Thai where fewer users might participate in community notes.
2. Freedom of Expression vs. Misinformation:
-
More Speech: The move is seen by some as a return to Meta’s foundational principles of promoting free speech. For Thai users, this could mean fewer restrictions on discussing topics like immigration, gender issues, or political critique, which have sometimes been moderated under previous policies.
The move is seen by some as a return to Meta’s foundational principles of promoting free speech. For Thai users, this could mean fewer restrictions on discussing topics like immigration, gender issues, or political critique, which have sometimes been moderated under previous policies.
-
Risk of Harmful Content: Critics fear this could lead to an increase in hate speech, conspiracy theories, or propaganda, especially in a country like Thailand with a history of political turbulence. The absence of professional fact-checkers might allow misleading narratives to gain traction, affecting public opinion or even inciting unrest.
Critics fear this could lead to an increase in hate speech, conspiracy theories, or propaganda, especially in a country like Thailand with a history of political turbulence. The absence of professional fact-checkers might allow misleading narratives to gain traction, affecting public opinion or even inciting unrest.
3. User Engagement and Responsibility:
-
Empowerment: Thai users could find themselves more engaged, as they take on roles in managing content accuracy. This could foster a sense of community and responsibility among users, potentially leading to more accurate information ecosystems if managed well.
Thai users could find themselves more engaged, as they take on roles in managing content accuracy. This could foster a sense of community and responsibility among users, potentially leading to more accurate information ecosystems if managed well.
-
User Overload: On the flip side, the burden of fact-checking could fall on users who might not have the time, resources, or expertise to do so effectively. This could lead to fatigue or disengagement, particularly among those less tech-savvy or not as deeply invested in the platform’s community governance.
On the flip side, the burden of fact-checking could fall on users who might not have the time, resources, or expertise to do so effectively. This could lead to fatigue or disengagement, particularly among those less tech-savvy or not as deeply invested in the platform’s community governance.
4. Regulatory and Social Consequences:
-
Legal Challenges: Thailand has strict laws regarding online content and defamation, particularly concerning lèse-majesté. Without fact-checkers, navigating these legal landscapes could become more complex for Meta, potentially leading to more content being flagged or removed by other means. In Thailand defamation and libel is not just civil but also criminal and can carry intense penalties.
Thailand has strict laws regarding online content and defamation, particularly concerning lèse-majesté. Without fact-checkers, navigating these legal landscapes could become more complex for Meta, potentially leading to more content being flagged or removed by other means. In Thailand defamation and libel is not just civil but also criminal and can carry intense penalties.